ANALISIS KELEMBAGAAN SKEMA IZIN PEMANFAATAN HUTAN PERHUTANAN SOSIAL PADA KAWASAN HUTAN LINDUNG GUNUNG RAKUTAK JAWA BARAT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35138/wanamukti.v26i2.613Keywords:
criteria and indicators, institutional characteristics, sustainable social forestryAbstract
In developing a sustainable Social Forestry system in Indonesia, it is necessary to strengthen institutional and appropriate administrative management. This research aims to identify the characteristics of the institutional aspects of the Social Forestry Forest Utilization Permits (SFFUP) scheme in Mount Rakutak protection forest area. This research was conducted using criteria and indicator assessment methods that refer to sustainable social forestry institutional management. Data collection was carried out using a closed interview method with SFFUP participants. The results of research on institutional characteristics show that the policy implementation aspect is in the good category, the leadership aspect is in the good category, the institutional management aspect is in the bad category, the group transparency aspect is in the bad category, the aspect of trust towards stakeholders is in the good category, the conflict management aspect is in the fair category and the member development aspect is in the bad category. The results of the overall assessment of institutional aspects show that the implementation of the SFFUP scheme has not paid attention to sustainable governance of institutional aspects. To realize the successful implementation of SFFUP scheme, it is necessary to strengthen institutional aspects based on the 7 criteria and 30 indicators that have been found in this research.References
Akib, H. (2010). Implementasi Kebijakan: Apa, mengapa, bagimana. J. Adminstrasi Publik, 1(1): 1–11.
Anderson, T. L., & Schmid, A. A. (1979). Properly, power, and public choice . New York: Praeger Publishers, 1978, xiv + 316 pp., price unknown,†Am. J. Agric. Econ., 61(1): 195–196.
Anonim. (2017a). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.39/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/6/2017 tentang Perhutanan Sosial Di Wilayah Kerja Perum Perhutani. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI. Jakarta.
Anonim. (2017b). Keputusan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No SK.4616/KEMENLHK-PSKL/PKPS/PS;.0/9/2017 tentang Perubahan Keputusan Menteri LHK No.SK.3868/KEMENLHK-PSKL/PKPS/PSL.0/7/2017 Tanggal 11 Juli 2017 tentang Pemberian Ijin Pemanfaatan Hutan Perhutanan Sosial kepada Kelompok Tani Mulya Tani seluas 1888 (Seribu Delapan Ratus Delapan Puluh Delapan) Hektar pada Kawasan Hutan Lindung di Wilayah Kerja Perum Perhutani. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI. Jakarta.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Statistik Modal Sosial 2014. Subdirektorat Statistik Ketahanan Wilayah, Badan Pusat Statistik. Jakarta.
Bintari, A. (2018). Manajemen Konflik penyelesaian kasus reklamasi Pulau G Pantai Utara Jakarta,†CosmoGov, 4(1): 1-119.
Blomquist, W. & Ostrom, E. (1985). Institutional capacity and the resolution of a commons dilemma. Policy Studies Review, 5(2): 383-393.
Choudhry, N.K., Stelfox, H.T., Detsky, A.S. (2002). Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA. (2002);287((5)):612–617.
Dimas, F., Adelina, C., Fadhilla, K., Husnul, & Satrio, A. W. (2019). Pengembangan kerangka evaluasi Program Perhutanan Sosial di Kawasan Hutan Lindung: Studi kasus Hutan Kemasyarakatan (Hkm) dan Hutan Nagari (Hn),†WRI, 1-40.
Hikmah, N., Mahbub, A. S., & Supratman, S. (2018). Strategi pengembangan program pemberdayaan masyarakat Hutan Kemasyarakatan di Desa Gunung Silanu Kecamatan Bangkala Kabupaten Jeneponto. J. Hutan dan Masy., 10(2), 1-246.
Hutomo, P., Sofhani T.F., Gunawan B., dan Syamsudin T.S., 2018. Collaborative Behavior Network on Management of Mount Geulis Protected Forest at Sumedang Regency, West Java Province, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 13 (2): 85-102. Penerbit UMT
Iskandar. (2013). Implementasi kebijakan Hutan Tanaman Rakyat di Kabupaten Bulungan, Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Paradigma, 2(2): 290 – 301
Kaleb, B. J. (2019). Penerapan sistem informasi manajemen dan pengawasannya di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Manado. J. EMBA J. Ris. Ekon. Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akunt., (1): 781–790.
Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 25, 467–487.
Maftuhah, M., & Noviekayati, I. (2010). Teknik reinforcement positif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan interaksi sosial pada kasus skizofrenia. Philanthr. J. Psychol., 4 (2): 1-158.
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nadeak, B. (2018). Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi Pendidikan Di Era 4.0. UKI Press.
Novatiani, A., Rusmawan Kusumah, R. W., & Vabiani, D. P. (2019). Pengaruh transparansi dan akuntabilitas terhadap kinerja instansi pemerintah. J. Ilmu Manaj. Dan Bisnis, 10 (1): 51–62.
Oliveira, N. B., McDougall, C., Ritchie, B., Hartanto H., Haggith M., & Setyawati, T. (2000). Developing criteria and indicators of community managed forests as assessment and learning tools: objectives, methodologies and results. CIFOR, p. 303.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing The Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 325(5939):419-22.
Paudel, K.P. (2002). Ensuring Peoples’ rights in forest resources: Revisiting the role of civil society, Journal of forest and livelihoods, vol. 1, no.1, pp.37-39.
Paudel, I., & Budhathoki, S. (1970). Unmet needs for family planning in Sunsari, eastern Nepal. Heal. Renaiss., 9(3): 148–151.
Pokharel R. K. & Tiwari, K. R. (2013). Good governance assessment in Nepal’s Community Forestry. J. Sustain. For., 32(6): 549–564.
Pokharel, R. K. (2012). Factors influencing the management regime of Nepal’s community forestry. For. Policy Econ., 17, 13–17.
Pokharel, R. K., Neupane, P. R., Tiwari, K. R., & Köhl, M. (1992). Assessing the sustainability in community based forestry: A case from Nepal. For. Policy Econ., 58, 75–84.
Pokharel, R. K., & Tiwari, K. R. (2018). Locally identified criteria, indicators and verifiers for evaluating sustainable community based forestry: a case from Nepal. Banko Janakari, 28 (1): 37–47.
Pujo, Sofhani T.F., Gunawan B., & Syamsudin T.S. (2018). Community Capacity Building in Social Forestry Development: A Review. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 29 (2): 113-126. ITB Journal Publisher.
Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
RECOFTC. (2020). Social forestry and climate change in the ASEAN region Situational analysis 2020. Bangkok, Thailand.
Riswanda, R., Tampubolon, A.P., Rachmawati, N.A., & Naada Thoi’ah, N. (2023). Pentingnya Keterbukaan Keuangan dan Transparansi Dalam Mempertahankan Kepercayaan Publik Pada Organisasi Nirlaba. Ulil Albab: 2 (7): 3197-3204.
Santoso, W. M., (2018). Kajian awal analisis hub-pengetahuan : Pusat Studi Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan ( P2KK-LIPI), 20(1): 143–164.
Sikor, Thomas & Gritten, David & Atkinson, Julian & Huy, Bao & Dahal, Ganga & Duangsathaporn, Khwanchai & Hurahura, Francis & Phanvilay, Khamla & Maryudi, Ahmad & Pulhin, Juan & Ramirez, Mark & Toh, Sumei & Vaz, Justine & Sokchea, Tol & Marona, Srey & Yaqiao, Zhao. (2013). Community forestry in Asia and the Pacific: Pathway to inclusive development. Publisher: RECOFTC - The Center for People and Forests. p.99
Smith, K. B. (2002). Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy Stud. J., 30 (3): 379–395.
Susilowati, S. H. (2016). Farmers aging phenomenon and reduction in young labor: Its Implication for agricultural development. Forum Penelit. Agroecon., 34, 35–55.
Tomoning, Y. (2015). Politik lokal di tingkat desa: Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah No 72 Tahun 2005 tentang Desa dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa di Desa Minton Tahun 2013 Kecamtan Taliabu Utara Kabupaten Pulau Taliabu Propinsi Maluku Utara). Politico: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 2(6), 20.
World Bank. (1992). World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2001). World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, T. L., & Schmid, A. A. (1979). Properly, power, and public choice . New York: Praeger Publishers, 1978, xiv + 316 pp., price unknown,†Am. J. Agric. Econ., 61(1): 195–196.
Anonim. (2017a). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia Nomor P.39/Menlhk/Setjen/Kum.1/6/2017 tentang Perhutanan Sosial Di Wilayah Kerja Perum Perhutani. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI. Jakarta.
Anonim. (2017b). Keputusan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No SK.4616/KEMENLHK-PSKL/PKPS/PS;.0/9/2017 tentang Perubahan Keputusan Menteri LHK No.SK.3868/KEMENLHK-PSKL/PKPS/PSL.0/7/2017 Tanggal 11 Juli 2017 tentang Pemberian Ijin Pemanfaatan Hutan Perhutanan Sosial kepada Kelompok Tani Mulya Tani seluas 1888 (Seribu Delapan Ratus Delapan Puluh Delapan) Hektar pada Kawasan Hutan Lindung di Wilayah Kerja Perum Perhutani. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan RI. Jakarta.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016). Statistik Modal Sosial 2014. Subdirektorat Statistik Ketahanan Wilayah, Badan Pusat Statistik. Jakarta.
Bintari, A. (2018). Manajemen Konflik penyelesaian kasus reklamasi Pulau G Pantai Utara Jakarta,†CosmoGov, 4(1): 1-119.
Blomquist, W. & Ostrom, E. (1985). Institutional capacity and the resolution of a commons dilemma. Policy Studies Review, 5(2): 383-393.
Choudhry, N.K., Stelfox, H.T., Detsky, A.S. (2002). Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA. (2002);287((5)):612–617.
Dimas, F., Adelina, C., Fadhilla, K., Husnul, & Satrio, A. W. (2019). Pengembangan kerangka evaluasi Program Perhutanan Sosial di Kawasan Hutan Lindung: Studi kasus Hutan Kemasyarakatan (Hkm) dan Hutan Nagari (Hn),†WRI, 1-40.
Hikmah, N., Mahbub, A. S., & Supratman, S. (2018). Strategi pengembangan program pemberdayaan masyarakat Hutan Kemasyarakatan di Desa Gunung Silanu Kecamatan Bangkala Kabupaten Jeneponto. J. Hutan dan Masy., 10(2), 1-246.
Hutomo, P., Sofhani T.F., Gunawan B., dan Syamsudin T.S., 2018. Collaborative Behavior Network on Management of Mount Geulis Protected Forest at Sumedang Regency, West Java Province, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 13 (2): 85-102. Penerbit UMT
Iskandar. (2013). Implementasi kebijakan Hutan Tanaman Rakyat di Kabupaten Bulungan, Kalimantan Timur. Jurnal Paradigma, 2(2): 290 – 301
Kaleb, B. J. (2019). Penerapan sistem informasi manajemen dan pengawasannya di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Manado. J. EMBA J. Ris. Ekon. Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akunt., (1): 781–790.
Lin, N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 25, 467–487.
Maftuhah, M., & Noviekayati, I. (2010). Teknik reinforcement positif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan interaksi sosial pada kasus skizofrenia. Philanthr. J. Psychol., 4 (2): 1-158.
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nadeak, B. (2018). Kepemimpinan dan Perilaku Organisasi Pendidikan Di Era 4.0. UKI Press.
Novatiani, A., Rusmawan Kusumah, R. W., & Vabiani, D. P. (2019). Pengaruh transparansi dan akuntabilitas terhadap kinerja instansi pemerintah. J. Ilmu Manaj. Dan Bisnis, 10 (1): 51–62.
Oliveira, N. B., McDougall, C., Ritchie, B., Hartanto H., Haggith M., & Setyawati, T. (2000). Developing criteria and indicators of community managed forests as assessment and learning tools: objectives, methodologies and results. CIFOR, p. 303.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing The Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2009). A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems. Science, 325(5939):419-22.
Paudel, K.P. (2002). Ensuring Peoples’ rights in forest resources: Revisiting the role of civil society, Journal of forest and livelihoods, vol. 1, no.1, pp.37-39.
Paudel, I., & Budhathoki, S. (1970). Unmet needs for family planning in Sunsari, eastern Nepal. Heal. Renaiss., 9(3): 148–151.
Pokharel R. K. & Tiwari, K. R. (2013). Good governance assessment in Nepal’s Community Forestry. J. Sustain. For., 32(6): 549–564.
Pokharel, R. K. (2012). Factors influencing the management regime of Nepal’s community forestry. For. Policy Econ., 17, 13–17.
Pokharel, R. K., Neupane, P. R., Tiwari, K. R., & Köhl, M. (1992). Assessing the sustainability in community based forestry: A case from Nepal. For. Policy Econ., 58, 75–84.
Pokharel, R. K., & Tiwari, K. R. (2018). Locally identified criteria, indicators and verifiers for evaluating sustainable community based forestry: a case from Nepal. Banko Janakari, 28 (1): 37–47.
Pujo, Sofhani T.F., Gunawan B., & Syamsudin T.S. (2018). Community Capacity Building in Social Forestry Development: A Review. Journal of Regional and City Planning, 29 (2): 113-126. ITB Journal Publisher.
Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
RECOFTC. (2020). Social forestry and climate change in the ASEAN region Situational analysis 2020. Bangkok, Thailand.
Riswanda, R., Tampubolon, A.P., Rachmawati, N.A., & Naada Thoi’ah, N. (2023). Pentingnya Keterbukaan Keuangan dan Transparansi Dalam Mempertahankan Kepercayaan Publik Pada Organisasi Nirlaba. Ulil Albab: 2 (7): 3197-3204.
Santoso, W. M., (2018). Kajian awal analisis hub-pengetahuan : Pusat Studi Penelitian Kemasyarakatan dan Kebudayaan ( P2KK-LIPI), 20(1): 143–164.
Sikor, Thomas & Gritten, David & Atkinson, Julian & Huy, Bao & Dahal, Ganga & Duangsathaporn, Khwanchai & Hurahura, Francis & Phanvilay, Khamla & Maryudi, Ahmad & Pulhin, Juan & Ramirez, Mark & Toh, Sumei & Vaz, Justine & Sokchea, Tol & Marona, Srey & Yaqiao, Zhao. (2013). Community forestry in Asia and the Pacific: Pathway to inclusive development. Publisher: RECOFTC - The Center for People and Forests. p.99
Smith, K. B. (2002). Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy Stud. J., 30 (3): 379–395.
Susilowati, S. H. (2016). Farmers aging phenomenon and reduction in young labor: Its Implication for agricultural development. Forum Penelit. Agroecon., 34, 35–55.
Tomoning, Y. (2015). Politik lokal di tingkat desa: Studi Kasus Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah No 72 Tahun 2005 tentang Desa dalam Pemilihan Kepala Desa di Desa Minton Tahun 2013 Kecamtan Taliabu Utara Kabupaten Pulau Taliabu Propinsi Maluku Utara). Politico: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 2(6), 20.
World Bank. (1992). World Development Report 1992: Development and the Environment New York: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2001). World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
2023-12-28
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Wanamukti: Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish articles in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
